To me, ACDSee Pro 2 is a far better designed product, and one which I use 95% of the time. There are alternatives, though, and way less expensive too. I don't like how you have to "import" a folder of images just to work on them, and then have to export the images afterward, etc. Most folks on seem to have overwhelmingly chosen Lightroom (I think some don't really know anything else is out there), but I tried it and hated it. LightRoom because it uses the same editor that I already have in ACR 4. For the basics I like Capture, and then if more horsepower is needed there is always CS 3. I also have other editors, Aperture 2, LightZone,Īdobe PS CS 3, etc. There are a lot of choices for editing programs, my favorite for my D200 is NX/NX 2. He said he liked it, but he didn't say if he thought it was better than Bibble. His images and put it through NX 2 and sent it to him. Those tests showed the most detail on opening an image to come from Bibble, with NX a close second. He did some tests using NX, ACR, Bibble,Īnd LightRoom. It explains the featuresĪ pro that I know also just got the D300, and he prefers Bibble for editing his D300 images. There is a great book on NX 2 by Ben Long, titled Real World Capture NX 2. What you did get was the 60 day free trial. First, the free copies of Capture NX 2 that came with the D300 are long gone.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |